Impact of Losing USAID: Why the Shutdown Should Matter to You

You’ve probably heard of USAID, but do you know what the agency did and why the shutdown of it should matter to you? The US Agency for International Development had been at the forefront of humanitarian efforts until much of it was shuttered in late February by the Trump administration. It was founded in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy to provide life-saving aid across the globe – from disaster relief to public health initiatives. USAID’s mission was also meant to be a crucial element of the country’s national security. Aid was brought to countries in need and often through the collaboration with local governments and international organizations. Former USAID Speechwriter Kristina Drye joins Mark Becker, host of Rational Revolution, to share why the organization’s work was so vital and what losing USAID will mean in the long run. 

---

Listen to the complete discussion here:

---

“We work with countries to ensure stability and prosperity, which in turn helps us here at home,” Drye explains. “This includes everything from providing public health aid, like HIV treatments and vaccinations, to supporting agricultural efforts and disaster relief.”

Drye also points out the significant contributions of American farmers to the mission. USAID purchased billions of dollars worth of food from U.S. farmers, including lentils, peanuts, and wheat. It was then distributed globally every year.  These are efforts that directly support agriculture and small businesses. A state like Wisconsin would reap the economic benefits. 

“The impact of USAID’s work is felt across the US,” Drye says. “In fact, we source over $2 billion in food aid from American farmers each year. And it’s not just a humanitarian gesture—it’s a direct contribution to the U.S. economy.”

Becker asks about the ongoing debate surrounding foreign aid versus domestic spending, Drye says that the relationship isn’t a zero-sum game. 

“We don’t have to choose between helping Americans and helping people abroad,” Drye explains. “The reality is that our international work directly benefits the US by preventing disease outbreaks, supporting global stability, and strengthening trade relations.”

She describes USAID’s work as being similar to preventative healthcare. Addressing a global issue before it escalates, the US avoids larger, costlier consequences. An example? USAID’s efforts in eradicating malaria abroad helped reduce the potential for diseases to spread to the U.S. Similarly, supporting stable governments in regions like Central America prevents larger migration issues from impacting American borders.

Drye warns that cuts to foreign aid programs will have serious consequences, not just for those receiving aid, but for Americans as well. 

“The loss of USAID’s work will ripple back to us, affecting everything from agriculture to national security,” she says. “It’s not just a matter of helping others—it’s about investing in our own future.”

Drye calls USAID not only an instrument of global goodwill but a critical part of the country’s national security strategy and economic stability.